Campylobacter Lawyer & Attorney : Marler Clark : Campylobacter Blog

January 3, 2006
FoodProductionDaily.com
Ahmed ElAmin

A general increase in reported cases of Campylobacteriosis over the last few years in the EU's fifteen original member states indicates that food companies need to step up their safety procedures against the disease.

The statistics are in the European Commission's first report on the persistence in the EU of a range of zoonoses, foodborne diseases that are transmissible from animals to humans.

The report takes the pulse on the state of food safety in the EU, even as the bloc begins implementing tougher hygiene laws aimed at reducing outbreaks of diseases caused by contaminated products.

European consumers have become increasing concerned about food safety. As a result the EU and regulatory authorities in member states have been increasing their regulation of the industry, resulting in more costs and greater public scrutiny of manufacturers' operations. Recalls of products are also costly and impact on the company's brand image.

In 2004 the 25 EU countries reported a total of 6,860 outbreaks of zoonoses, with 42,447 people affected.

"The information submitted on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic bacteria indicated that animals and food of animal origin might serve as reservoirs for resistant bacteria with the risk of direct or indirect transfer of resistant bacteria to humans," the Commission found.

By far the most frequently reported zoonotic diseases in humans are salmonellosis and Campylobacteriosis, with the most deadly being listerious, the report found.

There were 192,703 reported cases of salmonellosis and 183,961 of Campylobacteriosis cases reported during 2004 in the EU's 25 member states. The totals have increased for 2004 due to the expansion of the EU to include 10 new member states.

The incidence of salmonellosis represent 42.2 cases per 100,000 population, which represents an increase of 22 per cent when compared with 2003, indicating the higher levels encountered in the new states.

The highest Salmonella contamination rates were due to poultry and pigs and the fresh meat from these animals. This indicates that eggs, poultry meat and pork are major sources of human Salmonella infections.

In the original member states, a general decreasing trend of salmonellosis has been observed in recent years. This decrease is most likely due to implementation of Salmonella control programmes in these countries, the Commission stated.

A quarter of all reported cases in EU-25 are from children aged up to four years, and there is a seasonal peak during the late summer to early autumn. Salmonella Enteritidis serovar comprised 76 per cent of all the reported cases in 2004.

The majority of samples were collected from various types of meat and meat products. The lowest levels of contamination were found in poultry, pig, and bovine meat during the last five-year period have been reported from Finland, Sweden and Norway.

Salmonella was detected at all levels of the poultry meat production, with the highest rates of contamination observed at the slaughterhouse and processing plants. Proportions of positive samples in poultry meat were generally lower than 10 per cent, with the lowest proportions reported in countries with control programmes in the poultry production.

At retail Salmonella was reported in fresh poultry meat ranging from two per cent to 18.5 per cent. A general decreasing trend of Salmonella in table eggs was observed in those countries that had reported consistently.

In pig meat, no clear trend was discernable, except for the Netherlands where a clear reduction was observed. Most countries reported Salmonella prevalences in pig meat below 10 per cent. The contamination levels in bovine meat were generally considerably lower.

Some members reported contamination of ready-to-eat-meat products at the same level as in fresh meat. Such products constitute a particular risk to human health. In milk and dairy products Salmonella was rarely reported.

Several surveys covering spices and herbs revealed relatively high Salmonella contamination. With a few exceptions, new member states generally reported similar levels of Salmonella in food as the original countries.

The overall incidence rate for Campylobacter was 47.6 cases per 100,000 population, a 32 per cent increase from 2003. An trend toward increasing incident rates was observed in the thirteen out of 15 original member states. The exceptions were Spain and Sweden, where rates went down.

The new and original states generally reported incidences within the same range with the exception of the Czech Republic, which reported the highestincidence of human Campylobacteriosis in the EU.

Poultry was the main souce of Campylobacter infections from food. In meat, the highest prevalence, greater than 80 per cent, was reported in poultry meat at slaughter. At the retail level Campylobacter was reported in poultry meat in a range of 8.1 per cent to 77 per cent.

Prevalences in pig meat and bovine meat at slaughter were considerably lower, ranging from no findings to 11.9 per cent. Campylobacter were also isolated from a variety of other foodstuffs such as fishery products, cheeses and vegetables.

The vast majority of the reported data on broiler flocks were from the Nordic countries, where the prevalence ranged from 3.1 per cent to 27 per cent. In all member states Campylobacter positive samples from poultry, pigs and cattle were generally high, ranging up to 91 per cent, 79.6 per cent and 64.2 per cent, respectively.

Voluntary or mandatory control programmes on Campylobacter in broilers exist in six member states and Norway. The control programmes have common traits, the Commission found. The laws generally ensure a high level of biosecurity in the flocks. Carcasses from positive flocks may be frozen or subjected to heat treatment.

With few exceptions, 20 to 50 per cent of all Campylobacter infections in humans were resistant to fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, quinolones and penicillins. Samples from animals and meat show a common resistance to streptomycin, fluoroquinolones, ampicillin and tetracycline.

Resistance to other antimicrobials, such as macrolides, varied between countries. In some members the vast majority of Campylobacter isolates from poultry, pigs and sheep were resistant to quinolones and fluoroquinolones. In some members, the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals has been restricted in order to prevent the emergence and spread of fluoroquinolone resistance.

A total of 1,267 cases of listeriosis was reported in 2004. The reported incidence in the EU in 2004 was 0.3 cases per 100,000 population which is similar to 2003.

However, in countries with several years of data the incidence of listeriosis has increased when compared with the previous five years. Listeriosis is mainly reported to occur among adults and elderly people. A total of 107 deaths due to listeriosis was recorded.

L. monocytogenes was isolated from many types of foodstuffs. Significant findings above the critical contamination level (100 bacteria/g) were most commonly reported from fishery products, and occasionally from meat products, cheeses and some ready-to-eat meat products.

A total of 4,143 cases of VTEC infections was reported from 17 MS in 2004. The incidence in the EU was 1.3 cases per 100,000 population. The overall number of human cases reported increased compared to 2003.

The majority of this increase was reported by the Czech Republic, which had 42 per cent of the total number of cases. By comparing only those states reporting data for 2003 and 2004, the total number actually decreased by three per cent from 2003 to 2004.

Yersinia bacteria cases caused over 10,000 people to get sick in the EU during 2004. Other bacterial zoonoses -- listeriosis, verotoxin producing Esherichia coli (VTEC) infections and brucellosis - each accounted for approximately 1,000 to 4,000 cases.

The numbers of reported listeriosis and VTEC cases seem to be increasing, while the reported numbers of brucellosis cases indicate a decline, the Commission reported.

The actual number of human tuberculosis cases caused by the bovine tuberculosis bacteria is hard to estimate due to incomplete data, but a total of 83 cases were reported in the EU.

Listeriosis accounted for the highest number of reported fatalities, a total of 107 deaths, in 2004.

In general, parasitic zoonotic infections caused fewer human cases than zoonotic bacteria did. There were around 300 to 400 reported cases of illness due to Trichinella and similar numbers of cases caused by Echinococcus parasites.

Toxoplasma was responsible for almost 2,000 cases. Two humans contracted the rabies virus in the EU, but the infections originated from countries outside the EU, the Commission stated.

Information on food-borne disease outbreaks were collected in the past at the EU level but for the year 2004 it has been extensively summarised for the first time. A total of 19 member states submitted the information on a voluntary basis.

All of the 10 new member states reported information for the first time in 2004. Some new members states reported relatively higher numbers of salmonellosis or trichinellosis cases in humans than were reported from the 15 original member states.

In animals the Trichinella parasites and rabies virus were also in many new member states more commonly found. Norway also takes part in the data collection system, as the only non-EU country.

The EU's new zoonoses directive 2003/99/EC became effect 12 June 2004. Reporting according to the new rules will start with data collected during 2005.

In 2004, data was collected according to the former Directive 92/117/EEC covering 11 zoonotic agents and zoonoses: Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, verotoxin producing E coli, tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis, Brucella, Yersinia, Trichinella, Echinococcus, Toxoplasma and rabies.

In addition, data on antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella and Campylobacter and E. coli as well as foodborne outbreaks were reported.

Zoonoses are diseases, which are transmissible from animals to humans. The infection can be acquired directly from animals, or through ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs. The seriousness of these diseases in humans can vary from mild symptoms to life threatening conditions.

• Email This
• Print
• Share Link

20/07/2005 - UK-based food processors who use poultry in their products are likely to face more safety regulations after a government report singles out chicken meat as the largest contributor to Campylobacter infections in the country.

"Given the prevalence of Campylobacter in poultry, and knowing how easily pathogens can persist and spread in the domestic and catering environments, we believe that reducing the level of the organism in poultry meat is likely to make a significant contribution to the battle against human foodborne illness," the advisory committee stated in a report to the Food Standards Agency (FSA).

The FSA has set a target of reducing the incidence of foodborne disease by 20 per cent by April 2006. Campylobacter is currently the biggest identified cause of bacterial infectious intestinal disease in the UK. A significant reduction in human campylobacteriosis would help the agency achieve its goal.

A 2001 FSA survey of raw fresh and frozen chicken purchased in the UK found 50 per cent of all samples tested were contaminated with Campylobacter. Campylobacter infection of chickens is not a problem peculiar to the UK. It is an issue of concern to a number of other countries, some of which were visited by the committee.

In a 2002 report, the committee identified evidence to suggest that improper handling and preparation of chicken is a contributing factor to the high incidence of Campylobacter infection. The new report looks at the handling of broiler chickens at slaughter houses, primary food processors and the rest of the supply chain.

"It is very important that industry grasps the nettle of controlling Campylobacter in primary production and processing because we do not regard it as reasonable to expect the problem only to be addressed further along the supply chain by consumers and commercial food handlers," the committee stated.

The committee also recommends that any measures introduced by the FSA should also apply to imports. In 2002, the UK imported about 350,000
tonnes of poultry meat, of which about 45,000 tonnes was from outside the EU.

Campylobacter infection may cause sicknesses ranging from mild diarrhoea lasting 24 hours to severe illness lasting more than a week. The incubation period is typically two to five days. Long-term infection may lead to neurological, rheumatological and renal problems in humans.

• Email This
• Print
• Share Link

Hazards of Healthy Living: Bottled Water and Salad Vegetables as Risk Factors for Campylobacter Infection

Meirion R. Evans, C. Donald Ribeiro, and Roland L. Salmon
University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff Public Health Laboratory, Cardiff, United Kingdom; and Public Health Laboratory Service Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (Wales), Cardiff, United Kingdom

Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, yet the etiology of this infection remains only partly explained. In a retrospective cohort study, we compared 213 sporadic campylobacter case-patients with 1,144 patients with negative fecal samples. Information was obtained on food history, animal contact, foreign travel, leisure activities, medical conditions, and medication use. Eating chicken, eating food from a fried chicken outlet, eating salad vegetables, drinking bottled water, and direct contact with cows or calves were all independently associated with infection. The population-attributable fractions for these risk factors explained nearly 70% of sporadic campylobacter infections. Eating chicken is a well-established risk factor, but consuming salad and bottled water are not. The association with salad may be explained by cross-contamination of food within the home, but the possibility that natural mineral water is a risk factor for campylobacter infection could have wide public health implications.

Campylobacter is the most commonly reported bacterial cause of foodborne infection in the Western world and affects more than 2 million people in the United States each year (1). In England and Wales, over 50,000 campylobacter cases are reported each year and show no signs of a decline in incidence (2). For every case reported to laboratory surveillance, another seven cases are estimated to occur in the community, suggesting that from 0.5% to 1.0% of the United Kingdom's population is infected annually (3). Although the infection usually causes a mild, self-limiting illness, serious sequelae, including Guillain-BarrÈ syndrome and death, occur in approximately 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 20,000 infections, respectively (1). Many national food safety agencies, such as the Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom, have set goals of reducing food poisoning. To achieve these goals, a much clearer understanding of the etiology of campylobacter infection will be necessary.

In spite of the frequency of campylobacter infections, the cause has proved elusive. Recognized outbreaks are rare and are usually caused by contaminated water, milk, or poultry (4,5). However, these food products explain only a small proportion of sporadic cases, and the source of infection is unaccounted for in >60% of U.K. campylobacter cases (6,7). Several case-control studies of risk factors for sporadic campylobacter infection have been performed in the United Kingdom (6--10), but many unanswered questions remain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study that involved mailing a questionnaire to the patient at the time the fecal specimen was received by the laboratory to investigate the cause of sporadic campylobacter infection in the community.

Methods
The study population included all persons living in the Cardiff area who consulted their general practitioner for gastrointestinal symptoms and subsequently submitted a diagnostic fecal sample for microbiologic testing from January 1 through December 31, 2001. Cardiff Public Health Laboratory is the sole laboratory providing a diagnostic microbiology service for the area. All specimens were cultured for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp, Shigella spp., and Escherichia coli O157 and examined for ova and parasites, by standard methods. Follow-up specimens from the same patient (<4 weeks after the previous specimen submission date); specimens received from hospital wards and other sites were excluded from study. The study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

Immediately upon receipt of the specimen at the laboratory (next working day), a questionnaire, together with an explanatory letter and a postage-paid envelope, was mailed to the patient. Patients who had not responded within 1 week were sent a reminder letter and provided with another questionnaire on request. The questionnaire asked about basic personal details, including age, sex, employment status, occupation, details of illness, and details of household contacts. It included sections on foreign travel, food and drink eaten, animal contact (pets and farm animals), outdoor leisure activities (gardening, walking, visits to parks or farms, fishing, swimming, and sports), and questions on specific medical conditions and medication (antacids, H2 antagonists, and antibiotics). The food history covered meat and fish, poultry and eggs, vegetables (raw vegetables, leaf vegetables [e.g., lettuce], salad vegetables [e.g., tomato], and prepared salads [e.g., coleslaw]), fruit, milk and dairy products, drinking water (tap water, bottled water, and other sources), and eating out (type of restaurant or takeaway). Participants were asked to respond yes or no and, to the question of exposure for tap water, to indicate the number of glasses drunk per day. All questions related to exposure in the 7 days before the onset of symptoms, except for those on antibiotics, which concerned the month before illness onset.

Case-patients were defined as any patient, not associated with an outbreak, who submitted a fecal sample that was positive for Campylobacter spp. on microbiologic culture. Case-patients were compared with patients whose samples were negative on culture and microscopic examination. Patients with an alternative microbiologic diagnosis were excluded (unless they had dual infection with campylobacter).

Initial univariate analysis was performed with Epi Info software (v. 6.04; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to calculate maximum likelihood estimates for Mantel-Haenzel odds ratios (OR) with exact 95% mid-p confidence limits. Continuous variables were analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. All reported p values are two sided. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed with Stata software (v. 6, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Risk factors were selected a priori on biologic grounds and grouped into four exposure categories: food and drink consumption; animal contact; leisure activities, including foreign travel; and medical history. Logistic regression models were first constructed for risk factors within each exposure category (adjustment A). We then fitted a model that combined all the independent risk factors (for which the Wald test p value for the adjusted OR was <0.10) from the four exposure categories (adjustment B). Finally, to detect any residual confounding, we fitted all personal factors with a p value of <0.10 (age group, presence of a child <5 years of age in the household, and employment status). Of these, only age group interacted significantly with the other terms as tested by goodness of fit and was therefore included in the final model (adjustment C). The population-attributable fraction for each risk factor associated with campylobacter infection was calculated by using methods described by Greenland and Drescher (11).

Results
Questionnaires were sent to 2,694 eligible patients; fecal samples from 346 (12.8%) were positive for Campylobacter spp. (including 4 dual infections: 3 with salmonella infection, 1 with giardiasis). No campylobacter outbreak occurred during the study period. Ninety-one patients (3.4%) were positive for other organisms (42 Salmonella spp., 20 Giardia lamblia, 12 Cryptosporidium sp., 7 Clostridium difficile, 2 Shigella sp., 2 E. coli O157, 1 amoebic dysentery, and 5 other parasites); these were excluded from further analysis. Responses were received from 213 (61.6%) of 346 persons with campylobacter infection and 1,144 (50.7%) of 2,257 persons with negative specimen results. Median delay in response (from date questionnaire sent to date questionnaire returned) was 6 days (range 2--73 days) for case-patients and 7 days (range 1--77 days) for non-case-patients (Kruskal-Wallis H 1.81, p=0.18).

Personal Factors and Symptoms
Case-patients (median 43 years of age, range 0--80 years of age) were significantly older than non-case-patients (median 36 years of age, range 0--100 years of age) (Kruskal-Wallis H 5.31, p=0.02) (Table 1). Non-case-patients were also more likely to come from a household that included a child <5 years of age (even after adjusting for the age of the respondent), although not more likely to report prior diarrheal illness in a household contact. Case-patients were more likely to report symptoms than non-case-patients, particularly fever (OR 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36 to 4.31), muscle aches (OR 3.13; 95% CI 2.32 to 4.22), and abdominal pain (OR 3.40; 95% CI 2.32 to 5.12. Nearly all case-patients and most non-case-patients had diarrhea, but case-patients (18.3%) were more likely than non-case-patients (11.8%) to report blood in the stool (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.46).

Food and Drink Consumed
Case-patients were more likely to report eating meat, including beef, pork, and ham; poultry products, including chicken and eggs; and a variety of uncooked vegetables and fruit, including lettuce, other salad vegetables (cucumber, tomatoes, etc.), preprepared salad (coleslaw, etc.), and fresh or frozen berries. An association existed with drinking bottled water (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.48 to 2.67) and between infection and drinking cold tap water (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.18) but not with drinking cold milk. Neither tap water nor milk consumption showed a dose response relationship. Case-patients were more likely to have eaten out in the 7 days before illness onset, particularly at a fried chicken outlet, sandwich bar, or other unspecified restaurant.

Animal Contact, Leisure Activities, and Medical History
Case-patients were no more likely than non-case-patients to report pet ownership or contact with other people's pets. Non-case-patients were more likely to own a pet rabbit, though this association was weaker after adjusting for age. Case-patients were more likely to have gone walking, to have visited a farm, or to report contact with cows or calves in the 7 days before illness, though the number of persons exposed to cows was very small. No difference existed in history of recent foreign travel. In respect to medical history, case-patients were no more likely than non-case-patients to suffer from diabetes or indigestion, or to be taking antacid or ulcer medicines but were less likely to report preexisting bowel disease or to have taken antibiotics in the month before onset of illness.

Multivariate Analysis
After adjustment for other variables within each of the four exposure groups (adjustment A), several independent risk factors were identified (Table 2). After combining all these variables (adjustment B), eating frozen fish, eggs, or berries; having milk delivered to the home; eating out at a Chinese restaurant or takeaway; and walking were dropped from the model as they made no independent contribution to the outcome. In the final model (adjustment C), five variables were identified as independent risk factors for campylobacter infection: eating chicken, eating salad vegetables other than lettuce (e.g., tomatoes, cucumber), drinking bottled water, eating out at a fried chicken outlet, and contact with cows or calves (Table 3). Eating lamb, owning a pet rabbit, a history of lower bowel problems, and having had antibiotics in the month before illness all showed a protective effect. The combined population-attributable fraction for the five independent risk variables associated with campylobacter infection was nearly 70%. The highest attributable fractions were for eating chicken (31%), eating salad (21%), or drinking bottled water (12%).

Discussion
Our study identified five risk factors for campylobacter infection that, if taken together, could account for most sporadic cases. Most important was eating chicken in the 7 days before onset of illness. Two other risk factors, not previously described, could also potentially account for a sizeable proportion of case-patients: eating salad vegetables such as tomatoes or cucumber and drinking bottled water.

The study used a retrospective cohort design that included all patients submitting fecal specimens through their general practitioner to a single laboratory. This design controls for patient characteristics associated with physician-consulting behavior and may also minimize recall bias associated with using healthy controls. Use of a laboratory study population does, however, have several disadvantages. Non-case-patients probably represent a group whose illnesses have disparate cause. Many may have had viral gastroenteritis since this is known to be common in the community and is not detectable by routine laboratory testing. This fact would explain why symptoms reported by non-case-patients were milder. Non-case-patients were also significantly more likely than case-patients to report a history of lower bowel problems, suggesting that some had pre-existing disease that might predispose to non-infectious diarrhea. Antibiotic use in the month before onset of illness was also more common in non-case-patients, and symptoms in these persons may therefore be a side effect of antibiotic treatment. Persons with pre-existing bowel problems may have atypical dietary habits, but neither a history of bowel problems nor of antibiotic use should affect the accuracy of food histories. The multivariate analysis controlled for both these variables.

The most consistent finding in studies of campylobacter infection etiology has been an association with eating chicken. This finding has been described in three previous U.K. studies (6,7,9), and in studies from the United States (12--16), Scandinavia (17--19), the Netherlands (20), Switzerland (21), and New Zealand (22,23). However, the relationship with chicken is sometimes only seen for eating undercooked chicken (12,22,23) or eating chicken away from home (8,15,22,23). Recent microbiologic studies of raw poultry in the United Kingdom indicate continuing high levels of campylobacter contamination in chicken and the occurrence of identical subtypes in both chicken and human isolates (24). Our finding of an association between illness and eating chicken or eating from a fried chicken outlet highlights the fact that chicken remains a major risk factor for campylobacter in the United Kingdom and that measures are needed both in the food industry and at home to promote thorough cooking of chicken and to reduce the risk for cross-contamination.

Neither eating salad vegetables nor drinking bottled water has previously been recognized as a risk factor. In our study, both these associations made a significant contribution to the final logistic regression model and could explain a substantial number of campylobacter infections. Both are also biologically plausible. Salad vegetables could be contaminated with campylobacter either before or after the point of sale. Contamination at the source could occur through contaminated soil or contaminated water during harvesting. Salad vegetables are often imported from abroad, and changes in the sourcing of such items could introduce new vehicles of campylobacter infection into the U.K. food chain. For example, contaminated imported lettuce has been identified as a vehicle of infection in recent salmonella and shigella outbreaks in the United Kingdom (25). However, recent extensive sampling of organic fruit and vegetables and ready-to-eat prepackaged salads in the United Kingdom found no pathogens such as Campylobacter, Salmonella, or E. coli O157, suggesting that contamination of such items is either rare or intermittent (26). Two reports on campylobacter outbreaks associated with salad have been published. Both of these involved contamination in the kitchen. The first was a 3-month long outbreak from cucumber served at a salad bar; the outbreak resolved after changes were made in food preparation and storage procedures (27). The second involved salad prepared by a foodhandler who exhibited symptoms of campylobacter infection (28). In a recent review of outbreaks in England and Wales (including five from campylobacter) linked with salad vegetables and fruit, cross-contamination was also the most frequently identified contributory factor (25). The association we observed was specific to items such as tomatoes and cucumber that require extensive handling during preparation and often the use of a chopping board, rather than with lettuce or with salads bought preprepared. This finding suggests that salad most likely gets cross-contaminated during food preparation.

Natural mineral water is usually obtained from springs and occasionally from borehole sources. In Europe, legislation requires that mineral water be free from parasites and pathogenic organisms but, unlike tap water, it may not be treated in any way that might alter its chemical composition (29). A variety of organisms, including coliforms, can be found in mineral water and will survive for a considerable length of time, particularly in uncarbonated water supplied in plastic bottles or bottled by hand (30). To our knowledge, campylobacter has not been identified in mineral water, but this may simply be because testing for campylobacter is rarely undertaken. Mineral water has, however, been identified in the past as a vehicle of transmission during a cholera epidemic (31) and as a potential source of typhoid fever in travelers (32). More recently, a study of diarrhea in HIV-infected persons found symptoms were significantly associated with drinking bottled or filtered water, whereas drinking tap water was protective (33). Drinking bottled water has also recently been identified as a possible risk factor for campylobacter infection acquired abroad (34), and for Campylobacter coli infection (35). These findings suggest that bottled water could, given the right circumstances, provide a vehicle of transmission for campylobacter.

A small proportion of cases were explained by contact of personswith cows or calves. This occurred exclusively within the context of a farm visit and probably reflects the urban context of our study. This association, though apparently uncommon, is entirely plausible. Occupational contact with animal feces (8), living on a farm (16,19), and contact with cattle (16,23) have all been previously described as risk factors for campylobacter infection. Healthy beef and dairy cattle both excrete campylobacter (36,37), and molecular evidence suggests a link between campylobacter in the farm environment with those causing disease in the community (38).

Our study confirms that eating chicken still plays an important role in the cause of campylobacter infection. It also identifies two potentially important new risk factors that merit further investigation: salad vegetables (and the associated risks of cross-contamination in the home) and bottled natural mineral water. Cross-contamination in the domestic kitchen is potentially preventable, but we need to know how it happens and what interventions are most effective at reducing the risk. Bottled water is a $35 billion worldwide industry (39). In the United States, 1.7 billion gallons of natural mineral water were consumed in 2000 (39). Consumption is also increasing dramatically in the United Kingdom (by approximately 10% each year), and approximately 300 million gallons of bottled water are now consumed annually (40). Consequently, increased illness from contamination of bottled water could be considerable. More studies of the microbiologic quality of natural mineral waters are required, and these should include testing for Campylobacter spp

• Email This
• Print
• Share Link